Judicial principles and studies

Assessment of Claim Value and Compensation for Land Value Loss from Electrical Installations

For admitting a cassation appeal the controlling measure is the claim value at filing, considering parties' demands; compensation for loss of land value from electrical works is confined to the affected area as defined by safety-distance rules.

Updated: 10 September 2026

Editorial summary of a judicial principle or decision; consult the source below and do not treat the firm as the author of the decision.

Smart reading summary

Understand and share the study quickly

Instant summary

For admitting a cassation appeal the controlling measure is the claim value at filing, considering parties' demands; compensation for loss of land value from electrical works is confined to the affected area as defined by safety-distance rules.

Key points

  • Subject
  • Summary
  • Practical significance

Useful for: Useful for initial reading and identifying questions that may need legal review.

This automatic summary is based on the published text. It is not legal advice and does not replace checking official sources and reviewing the facts with a qualified lawyer.

AI generation is optional and subject to Gemini usage limits. Do not send client data or attachments from this card.

01

Subject

This study summarizes two linked issues: how the claim value at filing governs admissibility for cassation appeals and how compensation for diminution of land value caused by electrical installations is delimited under the Electricity Law and related safety-distance rules.

02

Summary

- For purposes of lodging a cassation appeal, the controlling indicator is the value of the claim at the time of filing, taking into account the parties' claims; the ten-thousand dinar threshold pertains to the claim value itself rather than the amount ultimately awarded, unless the plaintiff's agent expressly limited the claim to the expert report amount. - Compensation for loss in land value is confined to the portion of the land that lies under, across, or above the electrical works as of their erection date, applying the Electricity Safety Distance Instructions No. (1) of 2003, which set horizontal clearance at 6 m and vertical clearance at 8 m. - Valuation does not extend to items cultivated or constructed on the land beyond the affected area, nor to harms outside the safety-distance zone; other types of damage are not treated as effects of electrical installations under the cited provision and do not fall under the civil tort provisions referenced when the installations are authorized by the Electricity Law.

03

Practical significance

Practically, the note clarifies that claim-value at filing determines cassation admissibility, and that compensation for diminished land value is limited to the legally defined affected area within the safety distances. This is an educational summary only; it is not a judicial text or legal advice and does not represent any court or council.

Frequently asked questions

Subject?

This study summarizes two linked issues: how the claim value at filing governs admissibility for cassation appeals and how compensation for diminution of land value caused by electrical installations is delimited under the Electricity Law and related safety-distance rules.

Summary?

- For purposes of lodging a cassation appeal, the controlling indicator is the value of the claim at the time of filing, taking into account the parties' claims; the ten-thousand dinar threshold pertains to the claim value itself rather than the amount ultimately awarded, unless the plaintiff's agent expressly limited the claim to the expert report amount. - Compensation for loss in land value is confined to the portion of the land that lies under, across, or above the electrical works as of their erection date, applying the Electricity Safety Distance Instructions No. (1) of 2003, which set horizontal clearance at 6 m and vertical clearance at 8 m. - Valuation does not extend to items cultivated or constructed on the land beyond the affected area, nor to harms outside the safety-distance zone; other types of damage are not treated as effects of electrical installations under the cited provision and do not fall under the civil tort provisions referenced when the installations are authorized by the Electricity Law.

Practical significance?

Practically, the note clarifies that claim-value at filing determines cassation admissibility, and that compensation for diminished land value is limited to the legally defined affected area within the safety distances. This is an educational summary only; it is not a judicial text or legal advice and does not represent any court or council.

Notice: this article is general educational information and does not constitute legal advice or a final assessment of any matter.

Sources and references

Verify the official text and latest amendments before relying on this material professionally.

Study collection

Courts, judicial principles, and enforcement

Browse the other studies in this subject through its dedicated topical section.

Open study collection

A related service path

Commercial and civil litigation

If this study is close to your matter, review the service scope and contact the firm to discuss the facts and documents.

Review the related service

Related Jordanian-law guides

Contextual links to related public guide routes; they remain limited to Jordanian law and do not replace matter review.

Read also