Judicial principles and studies
Change to Leave System and Its Relation to Arbitrary Dismissal
A brief summary examining whether an employer’s change to the leave system justifies treating an employee’s departure as arbitrary dismissal, and the effect of a final ruling in barring relitigation.
Courts and procedure
Judicial principles and studies
Updated: 10 September 2026
Editorial summary of a judicial principle or decision; consult the source below and do not treat the firm as the author of the decision.
Smart reading summary
Understand and share the study quickly
A brief summary examining whether an employer’s change to the leave system justifies treating an employee’s departure as arbitrary dismissal, and the effect of a final ruling in barring relitigation.
Key points
- Subject
- Summary
- Practical significance
Useful for: Useful for initial reading and identifying questions that may need legal review.
This automatic summary is based on the published text. It is not legal advice and does not replace checking official sources and reviewing the facts with a qualified lawyer.
AI generation is optional and subject to Gemini usage limits. Do not send client data or attachments from this card.
Subject
The study addresses two main points: an employer’s modification of the employees’ leave system and whether an employee’s departure for that reason amounts to arbitrary dismissal, and the prohibition on relitigating a matter already finally decided by the General Assembly of the Court of Cassation.
Summary
A change to the leave system is an organizational decision within the employer’s discretionary authority and is not among the situations listed in Article 29 of the Labor Law. Such a change does not alter or diminish an employee’s rights; therefore, resignation prompted solely by that change does not constitute arbitrary dismissal entitling the employee to compensation. Further, a party may not re-argue a matter that has been resolved by a final judgment of the General Assembly of the Court of Cassation.
Practical significance
Practically, employers can adjust leave arrangements within their managerial discretion provided they do not infringe established employee rights; claims for compensation based solely on departure due to such adjustments are limited. A final ruling by the General Assembly prevents reopening the same issue. This content is a general educational summary and not a judicial text or legal advice.
Frequently asked questions
Subject?
The study addresses two main points: an employer’s modification of the employees’ leave system and whether an employee’s departure for that reason amounts to arbitrary dismissal, and the prohibition on relitigating a matter already finally decided by the General Assembly of the Court of Cassation.
Summary?
A change to the leave system is an organizational decision within the employer’s discretionary authority and is not among the situations listed in Article 29 of the Labor Law. Such a change does not alter or diminish an employee’s rights; therefore, resignation prompted solely by that change does not constitute arbitrary dismissal entitling the employee to compensation. Further, a party may not re-argue a matter that has been resolved by a final judgment of the General Assembly of the Court of Cassation.
Practical significance?
Practically, employers can adjust leave arrangements within their managerial discretion provided they do not infringe established employee rights; claims for compensation based solely on departure due to such adjustments are limited. A final ruling by the General Assembly prevents reopening the same issue. This content is a general educational summary and not a judicial text or legal advice.
Sources and references
Verify the official text and latest amendments before relying on this material professionally.
Study collection
Work and employment
Browse the other studies in this subject through its dedicated topical section.
Open study collectionA related service path
Legal consultation and studies
If this study is close to your matter, review the service scope and contact the firm to discuss the facts and documents.
Review the related serviceRelated Jordanian-law guides
Contextual links to related public guide routes; they remain limited to Jordanian law and do not replace matter review.