Judicial principles and studies
Statement by an Accused Against a Co‑accused in the Same Charge Is Unlawful
The study examines reliance on a co‑defendant’s statement in a single charge and finds such a statement does not constitute conclusive legal evidence. Where the accused denies the charge and no conclusive proof is produced, the trial court’s acquittal should remain undisturbed.
Courts and procedure
Judicial principles and studies
Updated: 10 September 2026
Editorial summary of a judicial principle or decision; consult the source below and do not treat the firm as the author of the decision.
Smart reading summary
Understand and share the study quickly
The study examines reliance on a co‑defendant’s statement in a single charge and finds such a statement does not constitute conclusive legal evidence. Where the accused denies the charge and no conclusive proof is produced, the trial court’s acquittal should remain undisturbed.
Key points
- Subject
- Summary
- Practical significance
Useful for: Useful for initial reading and identifying questions that may need legal review.
This automatic summary is based on the published text. It is not legal advice and does not replace checking official sources and reviewing the facts with a qualified lawyer.
AI generation is optional and subject to Gemini usage limits. Do not send client data or attachments from this card.
Subject
The study addresses the legal effect of relying on a co‑defendant’s statement against another accused in the same charge, with reference to Article 148(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Summary
Where prosecution is based on an accused’s statement against a co‑accused that does not amount to conclusive legal evidence, and the accused consistently denies the allegation throughout the proceedings with no conclusive proof presented, the trial court’s finding of acquittal stands and there is no justification to disturb that assessment. This is an educational summary only; it is not a judicial text or legal advice.
Practical significance
Practically, a co‑defendant’s testimony alone cannot establish participation without conclusive legal evidence, and courts should respect the trial court’s conviction of innocence in such circumstances.
Frequently asked questions
Subject?
The study addresses the legal effect of relying on a co‑defendant’s statement against another accused in the same charge, with reference to Article 148(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Summary?
Where prosecution is based on an accused’s statement against a co‑accused that does not amount to conclusive legal evidence, and the accused consistently denies the allegation throughout the proceedings with no conclusive proof presented, the trial court’s finding of acquittal stands and there is no justification to disturb that assessment. This is an educational summary only; it is not a judicial text or legal advice.
Practical significance?
Practically, a co‑defendant’s testimony alone cannot establish participation without conclusive legal evidence, and courts should respect the trial court’s conviction of innocence in such circumstances.
Sources and references
Verify the official text and latest amendments before relying on this material professionally.
Study collection
Courts, judicial principles, and enforcement
Browse the other studies in this subject through its dedicated topical section.
Open study collectionA related service path
Commercial and civil litigation
If this study is close to your matter, review the service scope and contact the firm to discuss the facts and documents.
Review the related serviceRelated Jordanian-law guides
Contextual links to related public guide routes; they remain limited to Jordanian law and do not replace matter review.