Judicial principles and studies
Company Liquidation, Employee Rights, Liquidator as Defendant, Effect of Acknowledgment
Decision reference: تمييز حقوق هيئة عامة رقم ٢٧٦٠/٢٠٢٥.
The study summarizes rules for creditors’ claims during liquidation and the impact on employee claims, explains when suing the liquidator is proper or unfounded, and addresses the effect of an acknowledgement-and-undertaking instrument.
Companies and partners
Judicial principles and studies
Updated: 10 September 2026
Editorial summary of a judicial principle or decision; consult the source below and do not treat the firm as the author of the decision.
Smart reading summary
Understand and share the study quickly
The study summarizes rules for creditors’ claims during liquidation and the impact on employee claims, explains when suing the liquidator is proper or unfounded, and addresses the effect of an acknowledgement-and-undertaking instrument.
Key points
- Subject
- Summary
- Practical significance
Useful for: Useful for initial reading and identifying questions that may need legal review.
This automatic summary is based on the published text. It is not legal advice and does not replace checking official sources and reviewing the facts with a qualified lawyer.
AI generation is optional and subject to Gemini usage limits. Do not send client data or attachments from this card.
Subject
The points set out rules for filing creditors’ claims in voluntary liquidation under Article 264 of the Companies Law (as applied to LLCs by Article 76), the relation between liquidation procedures and employee claims under Article 138(b) of the Labor Law, and the legal effects of suing the liquidator and of an acknowledgement-and-undertaking instrument.
Summary
- Creditors must submit claims to the liquidator, whether due or not, within two months for residents and three months for non-residents from the publication of the liquidation notice; the liquidator or the court may extend by up to three additional months for a valid excuse. - Late claims may still be presented but are ranked after claims filed within the statutory periods. - The periods in Article 264 are not peremptory or statutes of limitation that bar litigation; liquidation procedures do not displace the labor-law limitation (two years from the cause of claim under Article 138(b)). - A sole partner’s signature on an acknowledgment-and-undertaking to satisfy current and future obligations renders him a proper defendant even if he was not a partner during the employee’s tenure. - Once the company’s legal personality ends with completion of liquidation and the liquidator’s mandate expires, suing the liquidator is not legally founded and such joinder should be dismissed.
Practical significance
- Creditors should file claims within the prescribed windows to preserve priority, while employees retain the ability to bring labor claims before competent courts subject to their specific limitation period. - An acknowledgment-and-undertaking can create a party that may be properly sued for company obligations. - Claims against a liquidator after the company’s formal dissolution risk dismissal for lack of proper adversary. This content is a general educational summary and is not a judicial text or legal advice.
Frequently asked questions
Subject?
The points set out rules for filing creditors’ claims in voluntary liquidation under Article 264 of the Companies Law (as applied to LLCs by Article 76), the relation between liquidation procedures and employee claims under Article 138(b) of the Labor Law, and the legal effects of suing the liquidator and of an acknowledgement-and-undertaking instrument.
Summary?
- Creditors must submit claims to the liquidator, whether due or not, within two months for residents and three months for non-residents from the publication of the liquidation notice; the liquidator or the court may extend by up to three additional months for a valid excuse. - Late claims may still be presented but are ranked after claims filed within the statutory periods. - The periods in Article 264 are not peremptory or statutes of limitation that bar litigation; liquidation procedures do not displace the labor-law limitation (two years from the cause of claim under Article 138(b)). - A sole partner’s signature on an acknowledgment-and-undertaking to satisfy current and future obligations renders him a proper defendant even if he was not a partner during the employee’s tenure. - Once the company’s legal personality ends with completion of liquidation and the liquidator’s mandate expires, suing the liquidator is not legally founded and such joinder should be dismissed.
Practical significance?
- Creditors should file claims within the prescribed windows to preserve priority, while employees retain the ability to bring labor claims before competent courts subject to their specific limitation period. - An acknowledgment-and-undertaking can create a party that may be properly sued for company obligations. - Claims against a liquidator after the company’s formal dissolution risk dismissal for lack of proper adversary. This content is a general educational summary and is not a judicial text or legal advice.
Sources and references
Verify the official text and latest amendments before relying on this material professionally.
Study collection
Work and employment
Browse the other studies in this subject through its dedicated topical section.
Open study collectionA related service path
Legal consultation and studies
If this study is close to your matter, review the service scope and contact the firm to discuss the facts and documents.
Review the related serviceRelated Jordanian-law guides
Contextual links to related public guide routes; they remain limited to Jordanian law and do not replace matter review.