Judicial principles and studies
Validity of the Search Record under Article (7) of the Code of Criminal Procedure
This study summarizes the conditions rendering a search record valid where information indicated forged electronic seals and computers, and how the owner's final answers and signature affect the procedure's validity per the referenced decision.
Crime and penalties
Judicial principles and studies
Updated: 10 September 2026
Editorial summary of a judicial principle or decision; consult the source below and do not treat the firm as the author of the decision.
Smart reading summary
Understand and share the study quickly
This study summarizes the conditions rendering a search record valid where information indicated forged electronic seals and computers, and how the owner's final answers and signature affect the procedure's validity per the referenced decision.
Key points
- Subject
- Summary
- Practical significance
Useful for: Useful for initial reading and identifying questions that may need legal review.
This automatic summary is based on the published text. It is not legal advice and does not replace checking official sources and reviewing the facts with a qualified lawyer.
AI generation is optional and subject to Gemini usage limits. Do not send client data or attachments from this card.
Subject
Examination of the validity of a search record under Article (7) of the Code of Criminal Procedure where information indicated the presence of forged electronic seals and computers used for forgery in the defendant's residence.
Summary
The procedure and the resulting search record are considered valid when these conditions are met: information about forgery tools; the search conducted after obtaining the customs public prosecutor's approval; the owner present and consenting to the search; seizure of the suspected devices; the owner being asked at the end whether anything was lost or damaged and answering no; and the owner voluntarily signing the seizure/search record. Under these circumstances the measure was held valid based on Article (7) and the Court of Cassation decision number ٢٠٢٣/٢٧٤٦. This is an educational summary only; it is not a judicial text or legal advice.
Practical significance
The summary highlights key procedural safeguards that support the validity of a search: securing prosecutor approval when required, ensuring the owner's presence and consent, proper documentation and seizure of devices, and recording the owner's final answers and signature to substantiate the lawfulness of the operation.
Frequently asked questions
Subject?
Examination of the validity of a search record under Article (7) of the Code of Criminal Procedure where information indicated the presence of forged electronic seals and computers used for forgery in the defendant's residence.
Summary?
The procedure and the resulting search record are considered valid when these conditions are met: information about forgery tools; the search conducted after obtaining the customs public prosecutor's approval; the owner present and consenting to the search; seizure of the suspected devices; the owner being asked at the end whether anything was lost or damaged and answering no; and the owner voluntarily signing the seizure/search record. Under these circumstances the measure was held valid based on Article (7) and the Court of Cassation decision number ٢٠٢٣/٢٧٤٦. This is an educational summary only; it is not a judicial text or legal advice.
Practical significance?
The summary highlights key procedural safeguards that support the validity of a search: securing prosecutor approval when required, ensuring the owner's presence and consent, proper documentation and seizure of devices, and recording the owner's final answers and signature to substantiate the lawfulness of the operation.
Sources and references
Verify the official text and latest amendments before relying on this material professionally.
Study collection
Real estate and leases
Browse the other studies in this subject through its dedicated topical section.
Open study collectionA related service path
Commercial and civil litigation
If this study is close to your matter, review the service scope and contact the firm to discuss the facts and documents.
Review the related serviceRelated Jordanian-law guides
Contextual links to related public guide routes; they remain limited to Jordanian law and do not replace matter review.