Judicial principles and studies
Appointing the Reference in Negative Jurisdictional Conflict — Territorial Subordination Criterion
Decision reference: تمييز حقوق هيئة عامة رقم ( 9199-2024).
A brief outline of how the competent judicial reference is determined in a negative conflict between courts under the same Court of Appeal, and the Court of Cassation’s shift to the territorial subordination criterion.
Courts and procedure
Judicial principles and studies
Updated: 10 September 2026
Editorial summary of a judicial principle or decision; consult the source below and do not treat the firm as the author of the decision.
Smart reading summary
Understand and share the study quickly
A brief outline of how the competent judicial reference is determined in a negative conflict between courts under the same Court of Appeal, and the Court of Cassation’s shift to the territorial subordination criterion.
Key points
- Subject
- Summary
- Practical significance
Useful for: Useful for initial reading and identifying questions that may need legal review.
This automatic summary is based on the published text. It is not legal advice and does not replace checking official sources and reviewing the facts with a qualified lawyer.
AI generation is optional and subject to Gemini usage limits. Do not send client data or attachments from this card.
Subject
This summary addresses how the competent judicial reference is appointed when a negative jurisdictional conflict arises between a magistrate court and a court of first instance that both fall under the same Court of Appeal. According to the official points, the Court of Appeal is competent to appoint the reference in that scenario; the Court of Cassation appoints the reference only when the conflict is between courts that do not belong to the same Court of Appeal or between appellate courts.
Summary
The official material records a change in the Court of Cassation’s jurisprudence: by decision No. (8331/2023) dated 26/2/2024, the Court adopted the territorial subordination criterion to identify the competent reference, while preserving legal positions where the reference had been previously appointed by judicial rulings. A designation issued by a non‑competent court is annulled by the Court of Cassation, and the conflict remains unresolved until the competent reference is appointed in accordance with the law. The appeal number cited in the points is: Distinction — Public Authority Rights No. (9199-2024). This content is an educational summary and is not a judicial text or legal advice.
Practical significance
This is a general educational summary based on the points published in the official source. It does not replace the original material or a review by Ashraf Al-Khawaja before relying on it for any action.
Frequently asked questions
Subject?
This summary addresses how the competent judicial reference is appointed when a negative jurisdictional conflict arises between a magistrate court and a court of first instance that both fall under the same Court of Appeal. According to the official points, the Court of Appeal is competent to appoint the reference in that scenario; the Court of Cassation appoints the reference only when the conflict is between courts that do not belong to the same Court of Appeal or between appellate courts.
Summary?
The official material records a change in the Court of Cassation’s jurisprudence: by decision No. (8331/2023) dated 26/2/2024, the Court adopted the territorial subordination criterion to identify the competent reference, while preserving legal positions where the reference had been previously appointed by judicial rulings. A designation issued by a non‑competent court is annulled by the Court of Cassation, and the conflict remains unresolved until the competent reference is appointed in accordance with the law. The appeal number cited in the points is: Distinction — Public Authority Rights No. (9199-2024). This content is an educational summary and is not a judicial text or legal advice.
Practical significance?
This is a general educational summary based on the points published in the official source. It does not replace the original material or a review by Ashraf Al-Khawaja before relying on it for any action.
Sources and references
Verify the official text and latest amendments before relying on this material professionally.
Study collection
Courts, judicial principles, and enforcement
Browse the other studies in this subject through its dedicated topical section.
Open study collectionA related service path
Commercial and civil litigation
If this study is close to your matter, review the service scope and contact the firm to discuss the facts and documents.
Review the related serviceRelated Jordanian-law guides
Contextual links to related public guide routes; they remain limited to Jordanian law and do not replace matter review.