Judicial principles and studies

Planning Levies, Change of Land Use, and Burden of Proof

Decision reference: تمييز حقوق هيئة عامة رقم (5170-2025)

The official points indicate that change of land use alone does not justify special planning levies; legitimacy requires the committee to specify intended works and objectives, and the imposing authority bears the burden of proof.

Updated: 10 September 2026

Editorial summary of a judicial principle or decision; consult the source below and do not treat the firm as the author of the decision.

Smart reading summary

Understand and share the study quickly

Instant summary

The official points indicate that change of land use alone does not justify special planning levies; legitimacy requires the committee to specify intended works and objectives, and the imposing authority bears the burden of proof.

Key points

  • Subject
  • Summary
  • Practical significance

Useful for: Useful for initial reading and identifying questions that may need legal review.

This automatic summary is based on the published text. It is not legal advice and does not replace checking official sources and reviewing the facts with a qualified lawyer.

AI generation is optional and subject to Gemini usage limits. Do not send client data or attachments from this card.

01

Subject

The points address whether special planning levies can be imposed because of a change in land use, who bears the burden of proof, and how other statutory provisions relate to such levies.

02

Summary

- A change of land use is not among the cases that permit imposing special planning levies; such levies are limited exclusively to the situations listed in Article 52 of the Cities, Villages and Buildings Regulation Law No. 79/1966, so changing use alone lacks legal basis for a levy. - The planning committee must set out the works and objectives intended to be achieved by imposing the levies, and the authority that imposes the levies bears the burden of proving their legality. - Articles 46 and 47 concern compensation for refusal to grant a permit or for granting it with conditions and are not related to the levies provided for in Article 52. - Directing a decisive oath in cases of change of use does not render the imposition of levies lawful, whether the oath is directed at the owner's request or otherwise. Note: This is an educational summary only; it is not a judicial text or legal advice.

03

Practical significance

This is a general educational summary based on the points published in the official source. It does not replace the original material or a review by Ashraf Al-Khawaja before relying on it for any action.

Frequently asked questions

Subject?

The points address whether special planning levies can be imposed because of a change in land use, who bears the burden of proof, and how other statutory provisions relate to such levies.

Summary?

- A change of land use is not among the cases that permit imposing special planning levies; such levies are limited exclusively to the situations listed in Article 52 of the Cities, Villages and Buildings Regulation Law No. 79/1966, so changing use alone lacks legal basis for a levy. - The planning committee must set out the works and objectives intended to be achieved by imposing the levies, and the authority that imposes the levies bears the burden of proving their legality. - Articles 46 and 47 concern compensation for refusal to grant a permit or for granting it with conditions and are not related to the levies provided for in Article 52. - Directing a decisive oath in cases of change of use does not render the imposition of levies lawful, whether the oath is directed at the owner's request or otherwise. Note: This is an educational summary only; it is not a judicial text or legal advice.

Practical significance?

This is a general educational summary based on the points published in the official source. It does not replace the original material or a review by Ashraf Al-Khawaja before relying on it for any action.

Notice: this article is general educational information and does not constitute legal advice or a final assessment of any matter.

Sources and references

Verify the official text and latest amendments before relying on this material professionally.

Study collection

Work and employment

Browse the other studies in this subject through its dedicated topical section.

Open study collection

A related service path

Legal consultation and studies

If this study is close to your matter, review the service scope and contact the firm to discuss the facts and documents.

Review the related service

Related Jordanian-law guides

Contextual links to related public guide routes; they remain limited to Jordanian law and do not replace matter review.

Read also