Judicial judgment — Madaba Court of First Instance sitting as an appellate court / Enforcement
Attachment of a Vehicle Used to Sell Goods
Decision reference: Decision No. 624 of 2026, Madaba Court of First Instance sitting as an appellate court, referring to Article 29(c) of the Enforcement Law.
Under the stated principle, a vehicle subject to attachment does not fall within the “machines and tools necessary for the profession” in Article 29(c) of the Enforcement Law. The exemption concerns craft tools essential to operation and production, not the vehicle in the circumstances described.
Courts and procedure
Judicial judgment — Madaba Court of First Instance sitting as an appellate court / Enforcement
Updated: 22 September 2026
Editorial summary of a judicial principle or decision; consult the source below and do not treat the firm as the author of the decision.
Smart reading summary
Understand and share the study quickly
Under the stated principle, a vehicle subject to attachment does not fall within the “machines and tools necessary for the profession” in Article 29(c) of the Enforcement Law. The exemption concerns craft tools essential to operation and production, not the vehicle in the circumstances described.
Key points
- Question
- Extracted principle
- Decision reference
Useful for: Useful for initial reading and identifying questions that may need legal review.
This automatic summary is based on the published text. It is not legal advice and does not replace checking official sources and reviewing the facts with a qualified lawyer.
AI generation is optional and subject to Gemini usage limits. Do not send client data or attachments from this card.
Question
May a bus used by a debtor to sell goods be exempt from attachment as a necessary professional tool?
Extracted principle
Under the stated principle, a vehicle subject to attachment does not fall within the “machines and tools necessary for the profession” in Article 29(c) of the Enforcement Law. The exemption concerns craft tools essential to operation and production, not the vehicle in the circumstances described.
Frequently asked questions
Question?
May a bus used by a debtor to sell goods be exempt from attachment as a necessary professional tool?
Extracted principle?
Under the stated principle, a vehicle subject to attachment does not fall within the “machines and tools necessary for the profession” in Article 29(c) of the Enforcement Law. The exemption concerns craft tools essential to operation and production, not the vehicle in the circumstances described.
Study collection
Courts, judicial principles, and enforcement
Browse the other studies in this subject through its dedicated topical section.
Open study collectionA related service path
Commercial and civil litigation
If this study is close to your matter, review the service scope and contact the firm to discuss the facts and documents.
Review the related serviceRelated Jordanian-law guides
Contextual links to related public guide routes; they remain limited to Jordanian law and do not replace matter review.